politics

OK, so Lynton Crosby is all better now so long as conditions. What are these conditions? After all, they define the limits of acceptable behaviour in our society. It looks like he’s not allowed, or won’t be allowed, or shouldn’t have been allowed to take part in ministerial meetings or sight government documents. The interesting…

Read More Lynton Crosby briefs the Cabinet. Vomit now, it will save time

We are ignorant and we are wrong and even pathologically ignorant. Or perhaps, following Dan Davies, we can’t do percentages. Either way, the Royal Statistical Society poll is bracingly depressing. I occasionally talk about the “deficit model of ignorance”. In the light of the poll, I thought I’d set it out more clearly. The deficit…

Read More The ignorant cannot be given fact pills. We’d better deal with it

It looks like people want to discuss “fiscal rules” again. seems in @hopisen & @anthonypainter 's view Labour can only earn fiscal credibility by putting someone else in charge http://t.co/0zjXz3kH9M — Declan Gaffney (@djmgaffneyw4) June 23, 2013 The first problem here is the obvious one. As in this post, the period when the “fiscal rules”…

Read More Avoiding the Last Social Democrat. The last thing we need are new fiscal rules

Yes, this is funny. But oh, for fucksake. Put council houses on EBay. I am not kidding. This is the pitifully vacuous snackthinking the mother of parliaments has to offer. Meanwhile, remember all that tebbly tebbly serious chinstroking about party financing and the difficult position of Labour’s link to the trade unions? Here’s random Twitter…

Read More internet commenters > parliament

There is a small industry developing in articles about why Labour should take UKIP seriously. Here is one, and now, here is another! I do not think Labour should take UKIP seriously. Why should they? UKIP voters are basically very like Tories. Nottingham University’s politics blog makes an important point here and here, which is…

Read More Labour should do anything but take UKIP seriously